IMG_1829-225x300IMG_1831-225x300
Chicago winters are notorious for snow and ice and with them comes a sharp rise in slip-and-fall injuries. While many people assume that any fall on ice automatically creates a lawsuit, Illinois law draws important distinctions about who may be liable, where the fall occurred, and whether the accumulation was “natural” or “unnatural.”  It is important to consult with an experienced lawyer to determine if you have a case. The Chicago slip & fall attorneys Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. have handled many slip & fall cases and we are thoroughly familiar with the current  law.

Understanding these distinctions is critical if you were injured in a winter slip-and-fall.

The General Rule in Illinois: No Automatic Liability for Snow and Ice

IMG_1794-225x300IMG_8180-225x300
Chicago has been investing heavily in pedestrian safety by installing newly built medians and pedestrian refuge islands across busy roadways. These changes are designed to slow traffic and give pedestrians a safer place to cross and in many ways, they do exactly that.

But there’s an unintended consequence many drivers are now encountering: emergency vehicles no longer have a clear center lane to use. This shift has created confusion, increased risk, and more near-misses on Chicago streets.

The Chicago personal injury lawyers of  Zneimer & Zneimer P.C., have seen how roadway design changes can impact real-world safety. Here’s what’s happening and what drivers should do.

IMG_1776-225x300IMG_7897-225x300
The polar vortex has arrived in Chicago.  When temperatures plunge to around zero, driving conditions can become dangerous fast, even on roads that look clear. Extreme cold creates unique hazards that increase the risk of serious crashes, injuries, and multi-vehicle accidents across the city and surrounding suburbs.

The personal injury lawyers of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. believe it is important to understand these risks to help prevent accidents and keep you safer during winter travel.

Why Extreme Cold Makes Driving More Dangerous

IMG_2089-225x300IMG_1771-225x300

Recently, I was driving home at night in a heavy rain storm. I was driving under the speed limit and keeping sharp attention to the road way because visibility was was a problem with the heavy rain, wind shield wipers furiously clearing the windshield and the glare of the on coming traffic. I was driving home down Western Avenue like I have done thousands of times. The road way was dark and wet and it was difficult to see any painted lines so I was aiming straight down the lane when right in front of me appeared the new concrete “pedestrian refuge median” that had been recently been constructed in the middle of the road way. My car wheel hits it at about 20 MPH blowing out the tire and leaving me shaken.  I was left wondering how I could have hit the pedestrian island when I was going straight.  Upon inspection of the new pedestrian island, I could see that drivers are now required to jog to the right to avoid hitting the pedestrian island.  Upon inspection of the pedestrian island with all its black tire marks and chipped cement, it is clear that I wasn’t the only one to hit the cement.  The personal injury lawyers of Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C. in this article will discuss the benefits and dangers of the recent additions to our Chicago roadways.

If you drive in Chicago, you’ve seen the changes: cement “bump-outs” at corners, concrete medians, refuge islands, protected bike lanes, and more roundabouts in places that used to be simple, wide-open intersections.

These features are often installed under the umbrella of Vision Zero—a traffic-safety philosophy that aims to reduce (and ultimately eliminate) serious crashes by redesigning streets so that inevitable human mistakes don’t turn into life-altering injuries.

IMG_6559-225x300IMG_8460-225x300
By Zneimer & Zneimer P.C., Chicago Pedestrian Injury Lawyers

Chicago has invested heavily in pedestrian safety in recent years. You see it everywhere: curb bump-outs, high-visibility crosswalks, pedestrian refuge islands, and redesigned intersections meant to slow cars and protect people on foot.  People are encouraged to cross at crosswalks but that doesn’t prevent people from jaywalking.

“Jaywalking” is not a single offense under Illinois law. It generally refers to crossing a street:

Trucking cases turn on paper, data, and the consistent systems that a motor carrier must run every day and then produce when something goes wrong. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations require carriers to preserve and produce safety-related records, and they also require cooperation during investigations. A carrier must make accident records available to authorized investigators and provide reasonable assistance, including full and truthful answers. That obligation matters in civil litigation because plaintiffs often need the same core information to prove what happened, who controlled the operation, and whether the carrier ignored known safety risks.  The Chicago trucking accident attorneys of Zneimer & Zneimer PC are familiar with the recordkeeping obligations of commercial carriers.

Start with the most direct recordkeeping duty. The regulations require each motor carrier to maintain an accident register for three years after the date of each accident. The register must include key fields that map neatly onto civil proof issues, including the date and location, the driver’s name, counts of injuries and fatalities, and whether hazardous materials were released. The regulations also contemplate preservation of official accident documentation, including copies of accident reports required by states, other governmental entities, or insurers.

In litigation, that accident register and those reports help identify every prior crash the carrier had to log, and they can expose patterns: repeat rear end collisions, repeated lane departure events, recurring brake issues, or a driver who keeps showing up in preventable incidents. Plaintiffs use that history to prove notice, to challenge “this came out of nowhere” defenses, and to support negligent hiring, negligent retention, negligent entrustment, and punitive exposure when a carrier kept rolling the dice.

When a commercial truck is involved in an accident, the collision happens in seconds. The accountability fight may last months or years. One regulation often decides whether the injured person can identify the right defendants quickly enough to preserve evidence and build a clean liability story.   49 CFR 390.21T requires a self propelled commercial motor vehicle to display two core identifiers. The vehicle must show the legal name or a single trade name of the motor carrier, and it must show the motor carrier’s USDOT number with the letters “USDOT” immediately before the number. The marking must appear on both sides of the vehicle. The letters must contrast sharply with the background. The marking must remain legible from 50 feet away while the vehicle stands still. The motor carrier must keep the marking in a condition that meets those requirements.

That is not cosmetic. It is a compliance obligation that demands daily execution. A carrier needs drivers, yard staff, and maintenance staff who understand what “legible from 50 feet” means in the real world. A carrier needs inspections that catch peeling vinyl, road grime, crash damage, poorly placed decals, and box trucks that collect soot until the company name disappears. A carrier also needs procedures for leased equipment and owner operators so the truck displays the correct operating identity when the load moves.

From a personal injury perspective, the marking rule influences four high stakes issues.

In trucking cases physics matters, but evidence often decides the outcome.  The federal regulations, 49 CFR Part 390 include a set of record rules that sound administrative, but are important for trucking injury litigation.

This requirement drives operational behavior. A compliant carrier trains safety staff to maintain centralized records or at least a reliable index. A compliant carrier builds a process for pulling documents quickly from terminals, third party systems, and electronic providers. A compliant carrier also understands that records include more than paper. They include electronic images, electronic documents, and systems that must reproduce the information accurately.

A federal investigation into a fatal crash highlights why record integrity matters. The National Transportation Safety Board investigated a December 2022 rear end collision in Virginia involving a tractor trailer operated by Triton Logistics Incorporated of Romeoville, Illinois. NTSB The NTSB described how the truck traveled far faster than the bus and the driver did not brake before impact. NTSB Reporting on the NTSB findings described fictitious driver accounts in an electronic logging device system that allowed drivers to exceed hours limits, which the NTSB linked to driver fatigue.

Truck-228x300

Truck

A serious truck crash in Chicago and elsewhere can look simple in the first headlines and blame the truck driver. A few sentences, a few quotes, and the news moves on.  However our experienced trucking injury attorneys know from experience that personal injury cases rarely start and end with the driver. Federal trucking safety rules acknowledge that safety starts before the driver turns the key, and place responsibility on the trucking company to know the rules, teach the rules, and require compliance.

The federal regulation, 49 C.F.R. § 390.3 state every employer must know and comply with the safety regulations, and every driver and employee must receive instruction and comply. Additionally, 49 C.F.R. § 390.11 says that when the regulations impose a duty on a driver, the motor carrier must require the driver to follow it.

IMG_1099-225x300
What happens if you are driving in Chicago and you are driving through a green light when all of a sudden a police car from your and comes through the red light and crashes into your car and you are injured.  Can you make a claim against the city if Chicago.  As in many legal scenarios: “it depends”. The personal injury lawyers of Zneimer &  Zneimer P.C. have handled these cases and they are always challenging.

Illinois law draws an important distinction between police officers driving in ordinary conditions and officers responding to an emergency call. That distinction directly affects the burden of proof an injured victim must meet in order to recover compensation.

Police Are Not Always Immune From Liability

Contact Information