La ciudad de Chicago ha realizado un esfuerzo concertado en los últimos años para hacer más seguro el cruce de calles para los peatones. La ciudad ha añadido extensiones de acera en los cruces peatonales, más señalización, ha pintado franjas tipo “cebra” en la calle y, en algunos casos, ha instalado luces intermitentes. Los abogados de lesiones personales de Chicago de Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C. señalan que aún queda mucho por hacer. Este artículo enumera los obstáculos que todavía existen para que las calles sean más seguras para los peatones.

Muchos conductores simplemente no se detienen en los cruces peatonales

Probablemente todos en Chicago han experimentado estar de pie en un cruce esperando para cruzar mientras autos y camiones pasan a toda velocidad sin siquiera reducir la velocidad. Uno puede aventurarse al tráfico si es lo suficientemente valiente —o imprudente— como para dar por sentado que los vehículos se detendrán, pero esto no es recomendable. Algunos conductores están distraídos. Otros son impacientes. Algunos creen erróneamente que los peatones siempre deben esperar.

The city of Chicago has made a concerted effort in recent year to make it safer for pedestrians to cross the street. The City has added pedestrian bump outs at crosswalks, more signage, painted zebras across the street and in some cases flashing lights. The Chicago personal injury lawyers of Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.  note that more work needs to be done.  This article lists the hurdles that still remain in making the streets safer for pedestrians.

Many drivers simply do not stop at crosswalks.

Everyone in Chicago has probably experienced standing at a crosswalk waiting to cross as cars and trucks zoom past without even slowing down. One can venture out into traffic if one is brave or foolish enough to take for granted that the traffic will stop but this is not recommended.  Some drivers are distracted. Others are impatient. Some mistakenly believe pedestrians must always wait.

The polar vortex has arrived in Chicago.  When temperatures plunge to around zero, driving conditions can become dangerous fast, even on roads that look clear. Extreme cold creates unique hazards that increase the risk of serious crashes, injuries, and multi-vehicle accidents across the city and surrounding suburbs.

The personal injury lawyers of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. believe it is important to understand these risks to help prevent accidents and keep you safer during winter travel.

Why Extreme Cold Makes Driving More Dangerous

Trucking cases turn on paper, data, and the consistent systems that a motor carrier must run every day and then produce when something goes wrong. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations require carriers to preserve and produce safety-related records, and they also require cooperation during investigations. A carrier must make accident records available to authorized investigators and provide reasonable assistance, including full and truthful answers. That obligation matters in civil litigation because plaintiffs often need the same core information to prove what happened, who controlled the operation, and whether the carrier ignored known safety risks.  The Chicago trucking accident attorneys of Zneimer & Zneimer PC are familiar with the recordkeeping obligations of commercial carriers.

Start with the most direct recordkeeping duty. The regulations require each motor carrier to maintain an accident register for three years after the date of each accident. The register must include key fields that map neatly onto civil proof issues, including the date and location, the driver’s name, counts of injuries and fatalities, and whether hazardous materials were released. The regulations also contemplate preservation of official accident documentation, including copies of accident reports required by states, other governmental entities, or insurers.

In litigation, that accident register and those reports help identify every prior crash the carrier had to log, and they can expose patterns: repeat rear end collisions, repeated lane departure events, recurring brake issues, or a driver who keeps showing up in preventable incidents. Plaintiffs use that history to prove notice, to challenge “this came out of nowhere” defenses, and to support negligent hiring, negligent retention, negligent entrustment, and punitive exposure when a carrier kept rolling the dice.