Chicago Accident Lawyer Blog

As bike sharing continues to expand throughout Chicago, the Attorneys of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. take note of the growing number of bicycle accidents involving Divvy bikes. Being involved in a bike crash can be stressful experience-so much so, that it can cause a victim to forget what actions need to be taken following an accident. In some cases, the victim may not know what post-accident procedures are necessary and/or appropriate. Our injury lawyers discuss the steps that a bicyclist should take in the event a collision occurs while using a Divvy bike.

Step 1. Call 911 immediately after the incident to obtain emergency assistance. For non-emergency situations, the victim can call 311 instead.

Step 2. Call the police district where the crash occurred, and file a police report. To find the appropriate district, see Police Districts in Chicago. Make sure the officer properly documents all information pertaining to the accident, including the facts of the incident, the parties involved, as well as any potential witnesses.

Bicycle accidents can occur for a variety of reasons. The Attorneys of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. represent the victims and family members of bike crashes that occurred in Chicago or a neighboring suburb. As bicycling increases throughout Chicagoland, so have bike-related amenities, including bike-sharing programs, bike rental agencies, and bike shops that sell bicycle parts, as well as new and used bikes. In some incidents, the cause or contributing factor to a bicycle accident was the actual bike being used, such as a bicycle that has recently been purchased, rented from an agency, or part of bike sharing program.

There are a variety of factors that must be taken in consideration in assessing the validity of a claim extending from the use, purchase, or rental, of a bicycle. In addition to evaluating the factual circumstances involved, it is important to identify the law applicable to the matter, whether local, state, federal, or a combination thereof. In newly emerging types of claim, such as those involving bike sharing facilities/programs, rulings in prior cases, referred to as case law, can also play a large part in the outcome of a particular matter.

In understanding the variations in each type of claim-bike sharing, bike rental, and bike sales-it is helpful to distinguish between the purchase of a consumer product and the purchase of a service. The purchase of a product, such as a bicycle, will often depend on whether the product is new or used, in addition to whether the consumer was purchasing a product or a service.

The Chicago lawyers of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. represent victims seeking compensation for injuries and losses sustained in bicycle accidents. Personal Injury claims extending from bike crashes can be complex, in the sense that there are numerous variations in prospective defendants, as well available sources of compensation. Below, we have compiled a list of persons and/or entities that can potentially provide a means of financial recovery to the victims of bicycling-related incidents. Examples of some specific issues have also been included.

Motorist. Negligent, reckless, or unlawful actions of a motorist (i.e., speeding; running a red light; failure to yield right-of-way or decrease speed; driver distraction; driving while impaired/intoxicated; dooring a bicyclist).

Homeowner. Failure to remedy dangerous conditions that pose a safety hazard to bicyclist (i.e. driveway maintenance; object obstructions/whether stationary or moving; visual obstructions/trees/hedges; falling trees; unattended children; dog or animal attacks).

The Attorneys of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. have repeatedly voiced our concerns over the safety of bicyclists in our communities. Increased ridership over the past few years has brought not only more accidents, but a wider variation in accident types. While often time we discuss bike crash issues in general terms, our concerns are perhaps better expressed by taking a look back at recent bike crashes that have occurred in the Chicago Metropolitan area.

Motorist kills cyclist at Intersection

On August 18, 2014, a 44-year-old Park Forest resident was struck and killed by a southbound motorist while bicycling eastbound at the intersection of 55th Street on Central Avenue in the Garfield Ridge community. Police cited the motorist for failing to reduce speed to avoid an accident.

The Attorneys of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. discuss the issue of the growing number of bike trail and bike path accidents in the Chicago area. In particular, we address the topic of bike pathway and trail incidents caused by what we refer to as ‘avoidance-related’ factors. Our use of the term ‘avoidance-related’ refers to actions taken by a bicyclist in attempt to avoid striking an oncoming pedestrian, bicyclist, or object, which as a result of such efforts, causes a subsequent fall or collision.

Avoidance-related accidents have long been a concern for cyclists that travel upon roadways. For example, swerving to avoid a vehicle that suddenly stops, only to strike an oncoming pedestrian, or worse yet, be struck by an oncoming vehicle. Likewise, attempting to avoid a dooring accident, which causes the bicyclist to fall, or collide with a person or object. These are just a few avoidance-related issues along roadways-now consider the same along bike paths and bike trails.

For explanatory purposes, we discuss a recent fatal bike accident that occurred along a Will County Forest Preserve Trail, as reported by the Chicago Tribune:

The Bicycle Accident Attorneys of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. comment on an important inquiry often presented by bike crash victims: ‘Can violating a traffic law or bicycle regulation impact my personal injury claim?’ Generally speaking this question can be answered with a ‘YES,’ however, the better response is really ‘DEPENDS.’ While part of safe and responsible bicycling requires adherence to both state and local law, not every unlawful action will play a role in the outcome of a personal injury claim.

In some cases, the law expressly exempts a particular violation from being presented as evidence in civil claims extending from an accident or injury. For example, many Chicagoland communities that require minors to wear helmets have set forth an evidentiary exclusion for child helmet-use law violations. Pursuant to town/village code for Barrington, Cicero, Inverness, and Oak Park, violation of a child helmet law:

‘shall not constitute negligence, contributory negligence, assumption of risk, be considered in mitigation of damages of whatever nature, be admissible in evidence, or be the subject of comment by counsel in any action for the recovery of damages arising out of the operation of any bicycle, nor shall anything in this section change any existing law, rule, or procedure pertaining to any civil action.’